On 08 Feb 2013, at 17:23, John Clark wrote:
... consciousness is a byproduct of intelligence.
Consciousness might be the unconscious, i.e. instinctive and
automated, belief or bet in a reality, or self-consistency (for
machine expressing their beliefs in first order languages), so that
new programs can doubt old programs. Its selective advantage is the
self-speeding up provided by such bets. That's is useful for self-
moving entities, which have to anticipate quickly how their
neighborhood evolves relatively to them.
This makes all Löbian systems conscious and self-conscious. But it is
not the system which is conscious, but the abstract person incarnated
and multiplied in all computations going through the systems' states
(which exist in arithmetic by Church's thesis).
Consciousness accelerates the growing of intelligence, which is needed
to develop different competence, and to make competence growing. But
consciousness and emotion can make competence having negative feedback
Consciousness is the ultimate first person decider in the matter of
first person good and bad.
Trivially, to be burned would not been first person felt as bad if it
was not conscious.
Consciousness can perhaps be characterized by the semantical fixed
point of an attempt of universal doubting procedure. It is what would
remain in case you doubt of (almost) everything. (Slezak defended a
similar idea, which is already in the talk of the sound self-
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.