On 2/27/2013 9:14 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 13:58, Stephen P. King wrote:

On 2/27/2013 5:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
[SPK] Are subsets of the UD equivalent to a Boolean Algebra?

The UD is not a set.

Dear Bruno,

   Why are you such a literalist?

Don't use technical terms, in that case.

Don't be such a hidebound stiff!

 Are the strings that make up the UD equivalent to a Boolean algebra?

The UD is one program. It is one string. And UD* is an infinitely complex structure, roughly equivalent to sigma_1 truth, and structured from inside by the 8 hypostases, none being boolean.

The UD is not an infinite number of Turing machine algorithms dovetailed together? There is no relation between a Turing Machine and a Boolean Algebra? I suspect that you know the relation but are not willing to discuss it! I think that you are evading my question!




You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to