>Thinking about how information content of a message

Big mistake.  Information is never contained with but 
exactly one exception, an envelope.

I made this point with Jesper Hoffmeyer regarding a 
statement in his book Biosemiotics, that information 
is represented but not contained in that representation.
That marks of chalk upon slate may be taken to represent 
information at a meta level above the reality of streaks 
of a deformed amorphous solid has nothing to do with 
the information represented by that deformation, nor the 
increase of entropy associated with the greater disorder 
obtained from that deformation; these are but three of 
the *informations* to be found upon review of those 
streaks.  Entropy is how nature sees information (not 
yet an established fact but I think the tea leaves read 
clear enough) but that has (presumably) nothing to do 
with how intelligent individuals see information, or 
as von Uexküll called such phenomena, signs.

Most definitely the information is not to be found 
within the material of its expression, its representation.
Rather, the information is already to be found within the 

That which is information is so by virtue of the acceptor 
of that information; else, it is noise.

And, write the information on a piece of paper and seal 
the paper within an envelope and you may justifiably 
claim that the information is contained; else, you are 
deluding yourself.

>has an inversely proportionate relationship with the 
>capacity of sender and receiver to synchronize with 
>each other.




You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to