On Saturday, March 2, 2013 6:22:42 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
> On 3/2/2013 1:44 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> He does talk about QM statistical randomness as far as synaptic activity
> goes,ï¿½ but he states clearly here:
> "How exactly such weights or probabilities of firing might work is not
> understood, but Tse argues that weights would constitute
> "informational" criteria as opposed to being simply physical. They
> could represent mental events that supervene on the physical brain
> This sounds a lot more like teleology than randomness or determinism.
> I don't think "supervene" means what you think it means.
That's because you don't understand that teleology is physical.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.