On 3/3/2013 10:11 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi Stephen,

That's a nice read but written under the materialist assumption so doesn't really apply to my question.

Terren

Hi Terren,


    Hummm, I can translate it in my mind over to the dual...



On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:

    On 3/3/2013 12:37 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
    Hi,

    When Bruno claims that physics can be derived from the UD, would
    a proof of that represent, on some level, a (partial) solution to
    the measure problem?

    Terren
--
    Hi Terren,

        It would seem so, or more accurately the other-way around. I
    just found this paper
    <http://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Tong_integers.pdf> which
    has as an abstract:

    "I review how discrete structures, embodied in the integers, appear in
    the laws of physics, from quantum mechanics to statistical
    mechanics to the Standard
    Model. I argue that the integers are emergent. If we are looking
    to build the future
    laws of physics, discrete mathematics is no better a starting
    point than the rules of
    scrabble."



--
Onward!

Stephen

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to