On 3/3/2013 10:11 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:

Hi Stephen,

##
Advertising

`That's a nice read but written under the materialist assumption so
``doesn't really apply to my question.
`
Terren

Hi Terren,
Hummm, I can translate it in my mind over to the dual...

`On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net
``<mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:
`
On 3/3/2013 12:37 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:

Hi,
When Bruno claims that physics can be derived from the UD, would
a proof of that represent, on some level, a (partial) solution to
the measure problem?
Terren

` --
`

Hi Terren,
It would seem so, or more accurately the other-way around. I
just found this paper
<http://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Tong_integers.pdf> which
has as an abstract:
"I review how discrete structures, embodied in the integers, appear in
the laws of physics, from quantum mechanics to statistical
mechanics to the Standard
Model. I argue that the integers are emergent. If we are looking
to build the future
laws of physics, discrete mathematics is no better a starting
point than the rules of
scrabble."

--
Onward!
Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.