On 3/3/2013 3:43 PM, Terren Suydam wrote:
Ok, maybe I'm missing something but I'm not sure how a paper that
assumes physics can say anything about how physics might emerge from
Check out this paper: http://boole.stanford.edu/pub/ratmech.pdf
On Mar 3, 2013 2:49 PM, "Stephen P. King" <stephe...@charter.net
On 3/3/2013 10:11 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
That's a nice read but written under the materialist assumption
so doesn't really apply to my question.
Hummm, I can translate it in my mind over to the dual...
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Stephen P. King
<stephe...@charter.net <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:
On 3/3/2013 12:37 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
When Bruno claims that physics can be derived from the UD,
would a proof of that represent, on some level, a (partial)
solution to the measure problem?
It would seem so, or more accurately the other-way
around. I just found this paper
which has as an abstract:
"I review how discrete structures, embodied in the integers,
the laws of physics, from quantum mechanics to statistical
mechanics to the Standard
Model. I argue that the integers are emergent. If we are
looking to build the future
laws of physics, discrete mathematics is no better a starting
point than the rules of
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.