On 3/3/2013 3:43 PM, Terren Suydam wrote:

Ok, maybe I'm missing something but I'm not sure how a paper that assumes physics can say anything about how physics might emerge from arithmetic.

    Check out this paper: http://boole.stanford.edu/pub/ratmech.pdf

On Mar 3, 2013 2:49 PM, "Stephen P. King" <stephe...@charter.net <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:

    On 3/3/2013 10:11 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
    Hi Stephen,

    That's a nice read but written under the materialist assumption
    so doesn't really apply to my question.


    Hi Terren,

        Hummm, I can translate it in my mind over to the dual...

    On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Stephen P. King
    <stephe...@charter.net <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:

        On 3/3/2013 12:37 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:

        When Bruno claims that physics can be derived from the UD,
        would a proof of that represent, on some level, a (partial)
        solution to the measure problem?

        Hi Terren,

            It would seem so, or more accurately the other-way
        around. I just found this paper
        which has as an abstract:

        "I review how discrete structures, embodied in the integers,
        appear in
        the laws of physics, from quantum mechanics to statistical
        mechanics to the Standard
        Model. I argue that the integers are emergent. If we are
        looking to build the future
        laws of physics, discrete mathematics is no better a starting
        point than the rules of



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to