On 3/5/2013 3:03 PM, William R. Buckley wrote:


You build an automaton, place it and turn it on, and from that point in time forward

the automaton reacts to acceptable information all on its own.

You contradict yourself -- - I don't think it has to be human -- machines only help

non-machines to interpret - - and if the human point is important, then surely

you will accept your definition to be that it must be biological life, for a machine

cannot be alive.

A machine is either a machine or it is not a machine -- a machine cannot be both

a machine and not a machine at the same time.


    Do we have a exact definition of what is a "machine"?



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to