On Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:55:02 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > On 3/7/2013 2:49 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > To act on itself, as far as I can understand it, would mean to be uncaused >> or truly random, which is indeed incompatible with determinism. But why >> should that have anything to do with "intentionality"? >> > > What is intention if not acting on, or better 'through' yourself? > > > We use the word "intention" as distinct from acting. >
No, it's an adjective also. We can act intentionally or unintentionally. The difference is a key concept in all justice systems in history. > One might intend to do X but be prevented or change ones mind. So > intention is having a plan of action with a positive feeling about it, a > feeling of determination. > You don't need to plan to do something intentionally. > All of which is compatible with determinism. > How so? Please explain and give an example. > The Mars rover probably has an intention to reach it's next sampling > point. > There probably is no Mars rover except in our intention to see it that way. Craig > > Brent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.