On 3/7/2013 11:37 PM, Terren Suydam wrote:
Ah. That's above my pay grade unfortunately. But I don't think our
immediate failure to solve that problem dooms the idea that a cat's
experience of the world is explainable in terms of mechanism.
Conversely, even if we did solve it, there would still be doubts. For
the time being, comp remains for me the most fruitful assumption about
reality, such as it is. It assumes so little and opens up such
I agree. I think that it becomes more open to applications once it
is aligned with, say, David Chalmers and Ben Goertzel's ideas. I am
interested in applications <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qnd-hdmgfk>. ;-)
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Stephen P. King
<stephe...@charter.net <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:
On 3/7/2013 10:40 PM, Terren Suydam wrote:
I'm game. Which puzzle are we figuring out?
A solution to Bruno's 'arithmetic body problem'.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.