No, I did: "Nothing that I propose here can be construed as contradicting any natural observation. Not only do my ideas about the relation between body and mind or matter and sense not require any additional force within public physics, but they explicitly avoid it by definition. My interpretation is a commentary on the umbilical-symmetric-nested nature of the relation of public bodies and private experience, not a squeezing of private experience into public mechanics. If you cannot grasp this concept, I suggest that you stop reading now. You will never be able to understand Multisense Realism and you will be wasting your time to go on." 1. According to physics as we know it, everything in the universe > follows mechanistic rules. > Physics as we know it does not include consciousness in any way, therefore it is incomplete. What it covers is complete, but the context of the big picture is not. > 2. You don't believe biological systems such as brains follow mechanistic > rules. > I believe that whatever rules there are follow the physical reality of consciousness. What this entails is a private view which can be described as intentional and qualitative and a public view which can be described as unintentional and quantitative. (I think it's really a continuum which like a spectrum from one to the other, but to keep it simple, I say two views). > 3. So where is the experimental evidence for this? > Our own experience it the only evidence necessary and the only evidence possible. Craig > > > -- > Stathis Papaioannou > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.