On 3/15/2013 10:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2013, at 23:43, Stephen P. King wrote:
>> Dear Bruno,
>>     This is a nice lecture by Johan van Benthem that covers the kind of
>> approach that I am trying to use in my critique of comp:
>> http://videolectures.net/esslli2011_benthem_logic/ It gives a nice
>> alternative to the concept of a universal Platonic Mind or secular God
>> to whom all true statements are known to be true.
>>     It might help you understand my thinking. ;-)
> But it does not. Comp needs only arithmetical realism, and oppose itself
> to stronger form of platonism or realism, even for the physical. So I
> fail to see your point.

Dear Bruno,

        Arithmetic realism is self-stultifying as it assumes that properties
are innate at the ontological level. This denies the necessity of an
observer for what purpose would such have?

> Please make you point explicitly.

        Objects cannot be said to have properties independent of the means to
confirm the truthfulness of statements about those objects.

> But from your last post, I think that your theory is no-comp. But I am
> not interested in defending the truth of any theory. Just the validity
> of a reasoning, which shows that comp leads to a body problem.

        Your reasoning is correct but flawed as it assumes a fallacy ab initio.

> And
> that's what makes comp interesting, imo, as comp explains that the
> physical laws have a non physical origin. As a scientist, I don't care
> about the truth of a theory. I care only on its refutability.

        How is it possible to refute a theory that cannot account for the
existence of the entities (bodies) capable of refuting it? Unless you
have a solution of the arithmetic body problem your program is born dead.



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to