On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 6:52:20 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
>  
> On 3/20/2013 6:20 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>  
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:30:58 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: 
>>
>>  
>> On 3/20/2013 4:29 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>  
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:07:10 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: 
>>>
>>>  On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>>  
>>> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm
>>>
>>> "We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex *as a whole*. The 
>>> brain is a non-stop, always-active system. When we perceive something, the 
>>> information does not end up in a specific *part* of our brain. Rather, 
>>> it is added to the brain's existing activity. If we measure the 
>>> electrochemical activity of the whole cortex, we find wave-like patterns. 
>>> This shows that brain activity is not local but rather that activity 
>>> constantly moves from one part of the brain to another." 
>>>
>>> Not looking very charitable to the bottom-up, neuron machine view.
>>>
>>>
>>> The same description would apply to a computer.  Information moves 
>>> around and it is distributed over many transistors and magnetic domains.
>>>  
>>
>> But it is eventually stored in particular addressed memory locations. It 
>> is not part of a continuous wave of activity of the entire computer. 
>>
>> Craig 
>>  
>>  Hi Craig, 
>>
>>    What difference does that make?
>>  
>
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> The difference it makes to me that it is yet another example that the 
> mechanistic of view that the brain is increasingly unworkable, and that top 
> down organic qualities of  consciousness are increasingly supported. The 
> brain is not a collection of neurons so much as neurons are fragments of a 
> nervous system.
>
>  
>  Hi Craig,
>
>     Yes, the cogwork model of the world and its constituent subsets is a 
> rotting corpse, but there is still not a wide consensus on an alternative. 
> What we are seeing is a knock-down drag out fight for the next paradigm.
>

I agree, and I don't pretend to have a handle on the specifics of the next 
paradigm in neuroscience, but I think we have some of the broad strokes. 
Still, on this list, the rotting corpse is still strolling around... :)

Craig 


>
> -- 
> Onward!
>
> Stephen
>
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to