If any of you have a moderate astigmatism, you may have observed this - if 
not, you'll have to take my word for it.

If I close my weak eye*, I find that after a few seconds, the image from 
the strong eye, even though it is closed, tries to creep into my visual 
field. It is not difficult at this point to 'look through' the eye that is 
closed (seeing phosphenes or just darkness). Reversing the test, with my 
weak eye closed, there is no creeping effect and it is not really possible 
for me to look through the eye that is closed.

In a universe of functionalism or comp, I would expect that this would 
never happen, as my brain should always prioritize the information made 
available by any eye that is open over that of an eye which is closed. The 
fact that closing the weak eye instead does not produce the creeping image 
effect demonstrates that there is no functional purpose which could be 
served by favoring the strong eye when it is the one which is closed.

In some people astigmatism progresses until the develop a wandering eye. 
The physicalist can claim victory over the functionalist here in that the 
atrophy of nerve connections to the weak eye and the relative hypertrophy 
of the nerve connections to the strong eye clearly dominate the functional 
considerations of the visual mechanism. The creeping image effect also is 
not immediate, so that it is not the case that the hardware is incapable of 
maintaining clear vision through the weak eye, it is obviously the inertia 
of purely physical-perceptual processes which is dragging the function down.

Between the physical and the perceptual, which one is driving? It would 
seem that physics would win here, because the creeping image is not the 
more aesthetically rich image - however, this is not a case where the 
aesthetics are determined only from the top down. Remember that both eyes 
are exposed to the same light. The retinas receive the same total number of 
photons. The strong eye develops more robust connections to it not because 
it has more light, but because the shape of the eye is such that the cells 
(sub-personal agents) of the retina are able to make more sense out of the 
better focused light. 

There are not more signals being generated, but clearer signals which carry 
farther up the ladder from sub-personal optical detection to personal 
visual sensation. The nerve growth follows the coherence of visual 
consciousness, not a just a photological nutrient supply. The eye becomes 
stronger because the brain population is prioritizing higher sensitivity, 
not because neurons are being pushed around by blind ionic concentration 
gradients. That sensory priority is the cause of the neurological 
investment in that eye's sensitivity, so that it is perceptual inertia 
which drives the creeping image effect not just biological morphology. 

*which is my left eye. Curious if any of you left brainy types have an 
astigmatism in the right eye. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to