James Duane, professor at Regent Law School, notes in his
lecture<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc>concerning
legality/crime (the target and justification of supposed
surveillance efforts):

Estimates of the current size of the body of federal criminal law vary. It
has been reported that the Congressional Research Service *cannot even
count the current number of federal crimes*. These laws are scattered in
over 50 titles of the United States Code, encompassing roughly 27,000
pages. Worse yet, the statutory code sections often incorporate, by
reference, the provisions and sanctions of administrative regulations
promulgated by various regulatory agencies under congressional
authorization. Estimates of how many such regulations exist are even less
well settled, but the ABA thinks there are ”nearly 10,000.”

>From such pov, federal government can’t even count *how many laws there are*.
Do we still have to ask: Cui bono factoring in digital surveillance anyone?

Supreme Court Justice Breyer
elaborates<http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/98-93.ZD.html>
:

The complexity of modern federal criminal law, codified in several thousand
sections of the United States Code and the virtually infinite variety of
factual circumstances that might trigger an investigation into a possible
violation of the law, *make it difficult for anyone to know, in advance,
just when a particular set of statements might later appear (to a
prosecutor) to be relevant to some such investigation*.


What made me laugh recently was the following RT Interview of Putin
featured in Washington Post:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/06/13/vladimir-putin-defends-the-u-s-on-spying-programs-drones-and-occupy-wall-street/

While the article is dull to worthless, the video is surprisingly
entertaining, with a ton of salt of course, after few minutes or so of the
obligatory mucking about. Makes one wonder: "Guess who's come out of media
hiding, helping the U.S. pick up the pieces of its shattered privacy dream
at this moment?"

Another odd sync: Snow's billboard platinum hit in the 90s, "Informer",
with him behind bars in the music video, "Snowed-In" with all the sexy data
girls floating around him, rapping about some secret thing and blame, white
guy in Jail, Obama locked in White House reading sexy summaries of data
mining and cyber penetration efforts; intelligence of power every morning
served up on a silver plate by Keith. Putin is on the same page on this
issue at least.

Do empires ever step down gracefully or realize the effect of time? We've
all seen this movie thousands of times, we just don't seem to get the
ending bit. PGC



--
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to