On 8/18/2013 7:51 PM, chris peck wrote:
>> Increasingly code is the result of genetic algorithms being run over many
generations of Darwinian selection -- is this programmed code? What human
hand wrote it? At how many removes?
In evolutionary computations the 'programmer' has control over the fitness function
which ultimately guides the evolution of algorithms towards a highly specific goal.
Moreover, outside of the IT lab, there is no competition for the algorithm to evolve
against nor is there a genuine ecology supplying pressures against which selection can
happen. Why? Because that is what the fitness function provides. It is wrong to suppose
that genetic algorithms evolve without human input. The human input is as essential to
the evolutionary technique as natural selection is to evolution proper. Without it
nothing evolves at all.
That's only true within the AI lab. Suppose someone developed a STUXNET type program that
was supposed to learn the existence of nuclear programs and disable them, a really
intelligent program that could learn and plan. It might very well reason that having lots
of copies of itself would be more effective - and once reproduction starts can evolution
be far behind?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.