On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:34:42AM -0700, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > <http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/identity3.jpg?w=595> > > > <http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/identity3.jpg?w=595> > > Here’s a crazy little number that I like to call the Non-Well-Founded > Identity Principle. It woke my boiling brain up a few times last night, so > I present it now in its raw state of lunacy. > > The idea here is “For All A, A equals the integral between A and (the > integral between A and not A)”.

How are we to interpret this? You don't state what A is, but to have an integration limit of A implies it is an element of a Lebesgue measurable set. Yet the expression not-A implies that A is a set. Are you doing integration over sets of sets? What is your Lebesgue measure in this case? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics hpco...@hpcoders.com.au University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.