John Mikes <>
4:00 PM (8 minutes ago)
to everything-list

Dear Russell,
the Peat book seems to be on the physicist's side, just as the Hiley-book
(posthumus D.Bohm co-authored) which even pictures DB close to his 1952
image when his idea started to eliminate the differences of QM and
I have a - sort of - high level science-reportage:  by Reneé Weber:
"Dialogues with Scientists and Sages" (Arkana, 1986) with a reasonable
chapter with Bohm - also his references towards Krishnamurti and others.
I cannot activate my old computer's stuff on a discussion list stuff called:
'Friends of David Bohm' (early 90s)  with lots of details of his stuff.

My idea was the connection to Bishop Nicolaus de Cusa's 3 part world
(implicare, explicare, complicare - where I figured the 3rd one as math)
base for his protegé: Copernicus, saving the latter from the Inquisition -
the way I deduced it from "Wholeness...", a tortuous 2 decade path.
I think the 'Explicate Order' is our physical-world figment, while from the
'Implicate' I erased the 'Order' in my mind: no knowledge about that part
so to speak. An 'order' would be exaggerated.

After changing into a (similarly heretic?) Rosenite, the Bohm details
My agnostic views give me the peace of mind in an extended "I dunno".
I have a vague idea how to figure the infinity of the complexity (the
one(?)  beyond our conventional science 'model' of the world) - but only in
terms of our knowable items - no hint how the 'beyond model' may be
structured (if at all) and of what kind elements.

John M

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
For more options, visit

Reply via email to