In the above diagram, the nature of light is examined from a semiotic 
perspective. As with Piercian sign 
and semiotics in general the theme of interpretation is deconstructed as it 
pertains to meanings, interpreters, and objects. In this case the object or 
sign is “Optics”. This would be the classical, macroscopic appearance of 
light as beams or rays which can be focused and projected, Color wheels and 
primary colors are among the tools we use to orient our own human 
experience of vision with the universal nature of material illumination.

On the other side of bottom of the triangle is “Vision”. This is the 
component which gives vision a visual quality. The arrows leading to and 
from vision denote the incoming receptivity from optics and the outgoing 
engagement toward “Light”. When we see, our awareness is informed from the 
bottom up and the top down. Seeing rides on top of the low level 
interactions of our cells, while looking is our way of projecting our will 
as attention to the visual field.

While optics dictate measurable relationships among physical properties of 
light on the macroscopic scale, ‘light’ is the hypothetical third partner 
in the sensory triad. Light is both the microphysical functions of quantum 
electrodynamics and the absolute frame of perceptual relativity from which 
various perceptual inertial frames emerge. The span between light and 
optics  is marked by the polar graph and label “Image” to describe the role 
of resemblance and relativity. Image is a fusion of the cosmological truth 
of all that can be seen and illuminated (light), with the localization to a 
particular inertial frame (optics-in-space), and recapitulation by a 
particular interpreter – who is a time-feeler of private experience.

This triangle schema is not limited to light. Any sense can be used with 
varying degrees of success:


The overall picture can be generalized as well:


Note that the afferent and efferent sided of the triangle have a push-pull 
orientation, while the quanta side is an expanding graph. This is due to 
the difference between participation within spacetime, which is proprietary 
feeling, and the measured positions between participants on multiple scales 
or frames of participation. Sense is the totality of experience from which 
subjective extractions are derived. The physical mode describes the 
relation between each subjective experience and between other frames of 
subjective experience as representational tokens: bodies or forms. It’s all 
a kind of trail of breadcrumbs which lead back to the source, which is 
originality itself.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
For more options, visit

Reply via email to