On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 11:39:49 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
> On 17 October 2013 16:29, Craig Weinberg <whats...@gmail.com <javascript:>
> > wrote:
>> I'm trying to say that our contemporary approach to understanding 
>> awareness is fatally flawed. It suffers from a leaky philosophical vacuum, 
>> and maybe the premature confidence of a teenage civilization that imagines 
>> it to be finishing a race that is only halfway done.
>> OK, that's something I can understand (and even agree with). So do you 
> have some idea about how we *should* be understanding awareness, and can 
> you explain it simply, and preferably without doing violence to, for 
> example, our understanding of how TV sets work? (Or if you do have to do 
> violence to that notion, could you only do so after explaining how and why 
> you need to do violence to it, rather than throwing the idea into the 
> conversation willy-nilly and expecting the audience to understand?!)
> Explaining in the style of Bruno and comp, for example, would be good...

I have a lot written already. It depends which aspects you are interested 
in. Philosophy of mind positions? Mathematical abstractions? Diagrams? 
Podcasts or videos?





You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to