On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:07:04AM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 11:12 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 08:09:59PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
> >>>Consistency is []p & ~[]~p. I was saying []p & ~p, ie mistaken belief.
> >>ISTM that Bruno equivocates and [] sometimes means "believes" and sometimes 
> >>"provable".
> >>
> >And I'm doing the same. It's not such an issue - a mathematician will
> >only believe something if e can prove it.
> But provable(p)==>p  and believes(p)=/=>p, so why equivocate on
> them?  (And incidentally mathematicians believe stuff they can't
> prove all the time - that's how they choose things to try to prove).
> Brent

An unproven theorem is a conjecture. I don't think a mathematician
would formally say that they believe in a conjecture, they would say
something like "assume for the present argument".

Of course, when they take their mathematician's hat off, they would
say they believe in all sorts of unprovable things, like democracy,
free speech, etc.

Anyway, this is probably getting a little off topic. Bruno's answer is
probably better. 


Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics      hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to