On 22 Oct 2013, at 22:50, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 03:09:03PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Oct 2013, at 23:03, Russell Standish wrote:
In fact "p-> p" characterizes sigma_1 completeness (by a result
Albert Visser), and that is why to get the proba on the UD*, we use
the intensional nuance p & <>t (= proba) starting from G
with the axiom "p-> p" (limiting the proposition to the UD).
Sorry - I was actually asking what you meant by the word "proba".
OK. Sorry. It was an abbreviation for probability.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.