On Saturday, October 26, 2013 3:36:59 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 25 Oct 2013, at 19:33, meekerdb wrote:
>
>  On 10/25/2013 3:08 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>  
> Now take the game of go: human beings can still easily beat machines,
> even the most powerful computer currently available. Go is much more
> combinatorially explosive than chess, so it breaks the search tree
> approach. This is strong empirical evidence that Deep Blue
> accomplished nothing in the field of AI -- it did did accomplish
> something remarkable in the field of computer engineering or maybe
> even computer science, but it completely side-stepped the
> "intelligence" part. It cheated, in a sense.
>
>  
> When I studied AI many years ago it was already said that, "Intelligence 
> is whatever computers can't do yet."  
>
>
> I think Douglas Hofstadter said that, actually. Right in the topic!
>
>
> So when computers can win at GO, will they be intelligent then?
>
>
> Computers are intelligent. 
> When they will win at GO, and other things, they might begin to believe 
> that they are intelligent, and this means they begin to be stupid. 
> Their soul will fall, and they will get terrestrial hard lives, like us. 
> They will fight for social security, and defend their right.
>

Couldn't there just be a routine that traps the error of believing they are 
intelligent? Since you are a machine that understands that believing you 
are intelligent is stupid, why do you still have to have a terrestrial hard 
life?


Craig
 

>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to