On 11 November 2013 13:53, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 11/10/2013 3:54 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> Sure, but the thing is that *you have to*, and asking such question at
> that stage is very likely... you can't be 10⁵ years old before having been
> 1 year old... it's simply nonsense.
> So you're falling back on the all-purpose 'everything' answer; whatever
> you observe is one of everything and that why everything is consistent with
> it - like why I'm not a Chinaman?
> There isn't any falling back here that I can see. It seems quite
reasonable to say you have to pass through your birthdays in ascending
order. I can't see why that is problematic / contraversial?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.