On 11/10/2013 5:59 PM, LizR wrote:
On 11 November 2013 13:53, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>>
On 11/10/2013 3:54 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Sure, but the thing is that *you have to*, and asking such question at that
is very likely... you can't be 10⁵ years old before having been 1 year
So you're falling back on the all-purpose 'everything' answer; whatever you
is one of everything and that why everything is consistent with it - like
not a Chinaman?
There isn't any falling back here that I can see. It seems quite reasonable to say you
have to pass through your birthdays in ascending order. I can't see why that is
problematic / contraversial?
Sure, but if I live infinitely long I will have almost all my experiences older than 75.
So when I note that I'm not that old and that seems improbable, it's not an answer to say,
"Well, less than 75 is an age you must be sometime." Jason at least had an answer,
although I don't think his answer leads to immortality either.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.