On 11 November 2013 21:07, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2013, at 08:42, LizR wrote:
> On 10 November 2013 18:11, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> On 11/9/2013 6:13 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
>> Let me ask you Jesse do you suggest any substitute that we can turn to
>> for transforming world civilization to clean power? The only significant
>> thing I can think of, would be hiring Craig Venter to produce some methane
>> or hydrogen maker, that can, if necessary convert sea water to fuel.
>> You seem ignorant that converting sea water to fuel takes more energy
>> than you can get from burning the fuel (hydrogen). So you still need a
>> clean energy source to do the conversion.
>> This would be a possible way of creating fuel for easy transport. One of
> the big points about petrol is that it's very transportable. The best
> solution to the world's energy problems imho would be to find a method of
> extracting carbon dioxide from the air and converting it plus water into
> petrol using solar power. Carbon-neutral petrol and we don't have to rejig
> all our existing transport systems. If we can extract more carbon than we
> use we might even cool the earth too.
> Is that not what the plants are doing, all the time?
Yes, but unfortunately the whole process takes millions of years.
> Can we do better, I mean today?
> Not at carbon sequestration, but to achieve a reduction in CO2 by growing
plants we would have to stop using cars and power plants and so on. The
reason I gave the above suggestion is that if we can do it, it would enable
us to be carbon neutral without giving up our civilisation to do so.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.