On 11/12/2013 1:56 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>>
On 11/11/2013 5:04 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Every science whose conclusions have effects in politics has a high
being manipulated. In the URSS and here. From Anthropology to long term
Meteorology to everything in the middle. The one that does not realize
poor fool who does not know how the world works and has replaced with
innocent stupidity the fairy tales of the past with the fairy tales of
If you read the mails of the East Anglia Climategate scandal, One of
concern of the Warmists were about to keep in control over the peer
mechanism of the main scientific magazines Long interchanges of mails
devoted to talk about stablishing barriers in the peer reviewed
perverting the PR mechanisms.
Because they had already seen the process being manipulated by the well
Deniers and their political allies.
This is laughable. Not a SINGLE article against human warming was publised in the main
Of course, scientific magazines exist to summarize and popularize mainstream science. But
there have been articles denying AGW in geology, mining, and energy trade journals. But
that's not what I meant by manipulating the process. The reason the East Anglia
climatologists were irritated by requests for their data was that hired guns at right-wing
think tanks wanted to comb through the data to find some aspect that they could throw into
doubt. For their purpose it was enough just to create doubt about some small aspect to
the data. So long as they could say to legislators and the public that we should resolve
a question about tree ring data in California, or urban heat islands in Russia, or
principal factor analysis, or GCM prediction of tropospheric temperature in the tropics,
or the effect of cloud cover,...so long as they could manufacture controversy about
technical points, nothing would be done and their clients could continue business as usual.
It is exactly the same tactic that worked for many years as hired flacks for the tobacco
industry raised questions about the details of every study showing tobacco smoking caused
lung cancer: Mice aren't the same as humans. People who don't smoke get lung cancer too.
And it isn't surprising because the oil companies have hired some of the same people to do
and you said that the process was perverted by the "deniers"? I have no option but to
think that you believe en evil deamons with telepathic powers that try to hide your
coming apocalypse. And you are right. I´m one of them. This night, by black magic, I
will appear in your dreams and I will torment you. Careful whit me.
The fact is that peer reviewing is not a guaranty, on the contraty. It
an ideological filter rather than as a quality filter in every
which politics and scientists benefit from mutual cooperation by
money for ideological ammunition.
Yes, some scientists might be biased - so we should assumed you deniers
truth on the basis of no evidence except that in the past some scientists
You have your WW apocalypse, to believe in.
And you have to believe that your political analysis of any question will allow you
disregard the science by showing that all scientists, or at least all who discomfit your
world view, are venal and corrupt.
But because you will be sooner or later ridiculed by reality, I recommend you to search
for a replacement..
I recommend you move to the tropics.
What about the end of the ozone layer? no..that has been in fashion time ago but it
gains momentum every winter. What about the peak oil? Nah, fracking ended it,although
our ecoalarmist comrades are doing whatever they can to stop this menace against our
beloved apocalypse. I recommend you to study the chemtrails. They are the true menace.
End of transmission from Mars. bip bip
I knew you didn't live on this planet or care for it's future.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.