Chief Supreme Court Justice Marshall usurped the Constitution
when he maintained that the Supreme Court had the right to rule
laws made by Congress and signed by the President unconstitutional.
As a result the USA is essentially ruled by the Supreme Court

 There is no provision in the US Constitution for this right.
Congress instead has the right to regulate the Supreme Court,

Ie.:

ARTICLE III

   - 
Text<http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii?quicktabs_10=0#quicktabs-10>
   - Learn 
More<http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii?quicktabs_10=1#quicktabs-10>

SECTION 1.

The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme
Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time
ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts,
shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times,
receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished
during their continuance in office.
SECTION 2.

The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising
under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made,
or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting
ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty
and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States
shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a
state and citizens of another
state<http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxi>;--between
citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming
lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the
citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:35 PM, John Mikes <jami...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Telmo wrote:
>
>
>
> *"I admire the US constitution too. In fact, my political position is
> essentially to follow it (although I like to imagine possibilities for 
> **peaceful
> world with further increases in freedom)*."
>
> Which Constitution? the one epoch-opening chef-d'oeuvre based on
> modernized medieval ideas of those well educated smoking-duelling
> slave-owner male chauvinist Forefathers,
> who just did not want to pay taxes to the King of England, or the later
> "amended" versions of the same obsolete construct making it into a
> gun-toting killer - corrupt, faith-ruled money-monger (with SOME
> exceptions, thank you).
>
>  I join you in admiring the original one - as a relic, an innovation
> historical masterpiece FOR THE 18th CENTURY. Not for the 21st.
> My admiration stopped short when I realized the outcome:
> a 'special-interest money'-ruled anti-democratic conglomerate, *governing*a 
> so called government into committing crimes (international and domestic)
> originally excluded
> from it's 'modus (regulatio) vivendi'.
>
> How can you imagine a 'peaceful' world with capitalistic (I call it:
> econo-feudalistic) principles, imperialistic (oil?) wars and forcing own
> interest on other countries? (Not to
> mention the availability of all level governance for enough money).
>
> JM
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to