On 01 Dec 2013, at 08:45, Samiya Illias wrote:
then why should we reject the idea of having been created,
Or of having a non physical origin. "creation" involves the idea of
someone doing something with something, and so that idea take some
"something" for granted, and so miss by construction the goal of
explaining why we exist. Like Quentin said, "God created the universe"
leads to the problem of what is God, why and how has It created the
Also, in some culture, the universe can be the result of God sneezing,
or the result of God being unable to control the consequence of his
creation of something else. the danger of saying that we are created
by God is apparent in the doctrine that God has made the humans into
his own image. This leads to the idea that humans are somehow single
out from all creatures, when the truth might be that all creature are
equal and interconnected (as we see ecologically). We cannot pretend
that we are the favorite of God. You know the theory that God created
the cat in his own image, and then created the humans to be the
servants of the cats ...
just because we are unable to comprehend or define our Creator?
OK. But then God is only a pointer to our ignorance. If we cannot
comprehend God, we cannot use It as an explanation.
Here computationalism put some light by explaining that something (may
be just the arithmetical truth) is intrinsically ignored by all finite
creature. So if we are machine, there is something which transcend us,
and I think this is closer to the rational conception of the mystical
experience and of the God of the greeks and the mystics.
Is that not intellectual dishonesty?
It is dishonesty only when an alternative religion is proposed and
presented not as a religion, but as scientific facts.
Atheists are not honest, because by denying a God or all God, they
replace it without saying by another (impersonal) God, without
understanding that this is a theological theory which assumes a
theological axiom: the belief in a primitive physical universe/matter.
Some will call Occam razor, meaning that they extrapolate from their
dreamy (with comp) experience that a physical universe exist
primitively. But there are no evidence for that. Indeed with comp it
is far more plausible that we belong to an infinity of computations
whose existence is provable in elementary arithmetic: meaning: with
comp we might lead to disbelieve in the material creation, meaning
that comp is "atheist" with respect to the God of the atheists.
My point is that among all religions, atheism is the most dishonest
one, as they pretend to do science, and they mock the other as not
being serious. But science is agnostic and makes its assumption
explicit, and keep in mind that those are assumptions.
From the point of view of an aristotelian believer (like many
christians and basically all atheists) comp can be described as being
a super-atheism: as it might contradict both the existence of a
creator *and* the existence of a creation (physical universe). But
there is a universal dreamer (in arithmetic) and he is confronted to a
"ONE", the arithmetical truth which cannot not influence the dreams
possible and their statistics (dreams obeys laws).
It remains a big mystery: arithmetical truth, or our belief in
arithmetical truth. But this is assumed by all scientist, and comp
explain everything from it.
Samiya, in case you dont' see how all dreams are "generated" by
arithmetical truth, you can search on Google and Youtube with the key
"Mandelbrot set" which illustrates nicely how a very simple number
relation (a quite little program) can generate something infinitely
complex (and rather beautiful according to many). The Mandelbrot set
(restricted on the rational numbers) might be a compact representation
of a universal dovetailer, in which case *you* are infinitely
distributed ion its infinitely complex border.
The "god" of comp, like the God of most religion is transcendent, and
so we cannot use it as an explanation of the Origin, as it is more
complex than the origin, but it might gives the key for the End. God
is a soul attractor. It can also be a hope for possible harmony in the
chaotic complex reality. It is more like a goal, than an explanation
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.