On 12/17/2013 4:12 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:11 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net
On 12/17/2013 8:43 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
I think there may be a confusion of what I am suggesting. Let's say there
integer N, so large it cannot be described by anyone in this universe.
What I am
saying is that exactly one of the following two statements is true:
"N is prime", "N is not prime". I agree it is unreasonable to assert one
over the other in a universe where it is not known and not knowable.
whether the first statement happens to be true, or the second statement
be true, that statement was true independently of anyone in any universe
it, and so it would be true even if there were no physical universes or
Suppose I took the negation, "It is not the case that N is prime or N is not
and the rules of inference of paraconsistent logic. Would it make any
me? to anyone?
It would only violate the "law of the excluded middle".
That's not a violation in paraconsistent logics.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.