On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 11 Jan 2014, at 08:56, Stephen Paul King wrote:
> Der Bruno,
> The UD has no output. I guess you think to the trace of the UD, UD*, which
> from the first person perspective is "entirely given", by the 1p delay
> The UD never stops. If a process lasts forever, it is eternal, then it
> does not ever complete and thus its results never obtain in any way that
> can be considered as accessible.
> Then real numbers don't exist.
> To belong to your first person indeterminacy domain, the UD needs only to
> access the state, which, by non stopping, has to occur once. of course we
> might need to look at the 10^(10^1000) nth step of the UD. But the 1p is
> not aware of the "reconstitution" (in UD*) delay, so that does not matter.
> Either your state is accessed, or not, and if it is accessed it take a
> finite "time" (number of the UD-steps), and belongs to the indeterminacy
> domain. So the global FPI does have the whole infinite trace of the UD as
> domain, or if you prefer it is the infinite union of all its finite parts.
> Just keep in mind the step 2 and 4.
I was thinking: Shouldn't halting programs still contribute an infinite
amount of weight in the UD, since they are still reached an infinite number
of times (at least once each time the UD reaches itself). Perhaps there is
some noticeable cut off or difference in weight between those programs that
take longer to reach than the UD itself and those that occur multiple times
before the UD reaches itself.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.