On 23 January 2014 19:41, Pierz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Whaddya reckon? To me it makes an elegant sense, though I have no idea of > its testable. I suspect not, but it seems a lot cleaner than the "entire > backup" idea, OR the idea of a particle that carries its autobiography > under its arm. >
It seems to make sense as described (although whether it has any link with reality is another question...) Mind you, the multiverse's lack of redundancy in that all identical copies of an object are fungible (I believe is the word) may be the equivalent to git only storing differences...? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
