On 28 January 2014 10:59, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think that 0+1=1 already requires consciousness. If we assume that from >> the start, then all further argument is begging the question. If something >> can 'equal' something else, then consciousness is unnecessary. >> >> Could you explain? (I don't understand what's being said in any of the three sentences above, so would appreciate a "blow by blow" explanation if that's OK). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
