All, again a post FYI, not  because I necessarily believe it. Edgar

Big Bang Abandoned in New Model of the Universe

A new cosmology successfully explains the accelerating expansion of the 
universe without dark energy; but only if the universe has no beginning and 
no end.

As one of the few astrophysical events that most people are familiar with, 
the Big Bang has a special place in our culture. And while there is 
scientific consensus that it is the best explanation for the origin of the 
Universe, the debate is far from closed. However, it’s hard to find 
alternative models of the Universe without a beginning that are genuinely 
compelling.

That could change now with the fascinating work of Wun-Yi Shu at the 
National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan. Shu has developed an innovative 
new description of the Universe in which the roles of time space and mass 
are related in new kind of relativity.

Shu’s idea is that time and space are not independent entities but can be 
converted back and forth between each other. In his formulation of the 
geometry of spacetime, the speed of light is simply the conversion factor 
between the two. Similarly, mass and length are interchangeable in a 
relationship in which the conversion factor depends on both the 
gravitational constant G and the speed of light, neither of which need be 
constant.

So as the Universe expands, mass and time are converted to length and space 
and vice versa as it contracts.

This universe has no beginning or end, just alternating periods of 
expansion and contraction. *In fact, Shu shows that singularities cannot 
exist in this cosmos.*

It’s easy to dismiss this idea as just another amusing and unrealistic 
model dreamed up by those whacky comsologists.

That is until you look at the predictions it makes. During a period of 
expansion, an observer in this universe would see an odd kind of change in 
the red-shift of bright objects such as Type-I supernovas, as they 
accelerate away. It turns out, says Shu, that his data exactly matches the 
observations that astronomers have made on Earth.

This kind of acceleration is an ordinary feature of Shu’s universe.

That’s in stark contrast to the various models of the Universe based on the 
Big Bang. Since the accelerating expansion of the Universe was discovered, 
cosmologists have been performing some rather worrying contortions with the 
laws of physics to make their models work.

The most commonly discussed idea is that the universe is filled with a dark 
energy that is forcing the universe to expand at an increasing rate. For 
this model to work, dark energy must make up 75 per cent of the energy-mass 
of the Universe and be increasing at a fantastic rate.

But there is a serious price to pay for this idea: the law of conservation 
of energy. The embarrassing truth is that the world’s cosmologists have 
conveniently swept under the carpet one the of fundamental laws of physics 
in an attempt to square this circle.

That paints Shu’s ideas in a slightly different perspective. There’s no 
need to abandon conservation of energy to make his theory work.

That’s not to say Shu’s theory is perfect. Far from it. One of the biggest 
problems he faces is explaining the existence and structure of the cosmic 
microwave background, something that many astrophysicists believe to be the 
the strongest evidence that the Big Bang really did happen. The CMB, they 
say, is the echo of the Big bang.

How it might arise in Shu’s cosmology isn’t yet clear but I imagine he’s 
working on it.

Even if he finds a way, there will need to be some uncomfortable rethinking 
before his ideas can gain traction. His approach may well explain the 
Type-I supernova observations without abandoning conservation of energy but 
it asks us to give up the notion of the Big Bang, the constancy of the 
speed of light and to accept a vast new set of potential phenomenon related 
to the interchangeable relationships between mass, space and time.

Rightly or wrongly, that’s a trade off that many will find hard. Let’s hope 
Shu sticks to his guns, if only for the sake of good old-fashioned debate

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1007.1750: Cosmological Models with No Big Bang

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to