On Sunday, February 16, 2014 4:47:46 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote: > > When have I ever suggested that? I don't suppose any such thing. I would > however say that you have so far been impervious to reasoned argument with > respect to comp, on the sole apparent premise that your prior > "understanding" suffices to trump reason itself. >
You don't suggest that I can't understand comp, but you suggest that I am impervious to reasoned argument about it...why would that be the case if I understood comp as you seem to think it deserves to be understood? > David > On 16 Feb 2014 21:38, "Craig Weinberg" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sunday, February 16, 2014 2:09:13 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2014 19:05, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Why not being agnostic, especially that you have admitted not having >>>> studied computer science. >>>> >>>> Why being negative on something that you ignore? >>>> >>> >>> Because he "understands" that comp cannot possibly be true. >>> >> >> Just as you "understand" that I cannot possibly understand comp. >> >> >>> >>> David >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> >> . >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
