http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140217161106.htm

How evolution shapes the geometries of life
New research suggests that the shapes of both plants and animals evolved in 
response to the same mathematical and physical principles. By working 
through the logic underlying Kleiber’s Law (metabolism equals mass to the 
three-quarter power) and applying it separately to the geometry of plants 
and animals, researchers were able to show that plants and animals display 
equivalent energy efficiencies.

These questions have puzzled life scientists since ancient times. Now an 
interdisciplinary team of researchers from the University of Maryland and 
the University of Padua in Italy propose a thought-provoking answer based 
on a famous mathematical formula that has been accepted as true for 
generations, but never fully understood. In a paper published the week of 
Feb. 17, 2014 in the *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, the 
team offers a re-thinking of the formula known as Kleiber's Law. Seeing 
this formula as a mathematical expression of an evolutionary fact, the team 
suggests that plants' and animals' widely different forms evolved in 
parallel, as ideal ways to solve the problem of how to use energy 
efficiently.

If you studied biology in high school or college, odds are you memorized 
Kleiber's Law: metabolism equals mass to the three-quarter power. This 
formula, one of the few widely held tenets in biology, shows that as living 
things get larger, their metabolisms and their life spans increase at 
predictable rates. Named after the Swiss biologist Max Kleiber who 
formulated it in the 1930s, the law fits observations on everything from 
animals' energy intake to the number of young they bear. It's used to 
calculate the correct human dosage of a medicine tested on mice, among many 
other things.

But why does Kleiber's Law hold true? Generations of scientists have hunted 
unsuccessfully for a simple, convincing explanation. In this new paper, the 
researchers propose that the shapes of both plants and animals evolved in 
response to the same mathematical and physical principles. By working 
through the logic underlying Kleiber's mathematical formula, and applying 
it separately to the geometry of plants and animals, the team was able to 
explain decades worth of real-world observations.

"Plant and animal geometries have evolved more or less in parallel," said 
UMD botanist Todd Cooke. "The earliest plants and animals had simple and 
quite different bodies, but natural selection has acted on the two groups 
so the geometries of modern trees and animals are, remarkably, displaying 
equivalent energy efficiencies. They are both equally fit. And that is what 
Kleiber's Law is showing us."

Picture two organisms: a tree and a tiger. In evolutionary terms, the tree 
has the easier task: convert sunlight to energy and move it within a body 
that more or less stays put. To make that task as efficient as possible, 
the tree has evolved a branching shape with many surfaces -- its leaves.

"The tree's surface area and the volume of space it occupies are nearly the 
same," said physicist Jayanth Banavar, dean of the UMD College of Computer, 
Mathematical, and Natural Sciences. "The tree's nutrients flow at a 
constant speed, regardless of its size."

With these variables, the team calculated the relationship between the mass 
of different tree species and their metabolisms, and found that the 
relationship conformed to Kleiber's Law.
To nourish its mass, an animal needs fuel. Burning that fuel generates 
heat. The animal has to find a way to get rid of excess body heat. The 
obvious way is surface cooling. But because the tiger's surface area is 
proportionally smaller than its mass, the surface is not up to the task. 
The creature's hide would get blazing hot, and its coat might burst into 
flames.

So as animals get larger in size, their metabolism must increase at a 
slower rate than their volume, or they would not be able to get rid of the 
excess heat. If the surface area were the only thing that mattered, an 
animal's metabolism would increase as its size increased, at the rate of 
its mass to the two-thirds power. But Kleiber's Law, backed by many sets of 
observations, says the actual rate is mass to the three-quarters power.

Clearly there's a missing factor, and scientists have pored over the data 
in an attempt to find out what it is. Some have proposed that the missing 
part of the equation has to do with the space occupied by internal organs. 
Others have focused on the fractal, or branching, form that is common to 
tree limbs and animals' blood vessels, but added in new assumptions about 
the volume of fluids contained in those fractal networks.

The UMD and University of Padua researchers argue a crucial variable has 
been overlooked: the speed at which nutrients are carried throughout the 
animals' bodies and heat is carried away. So the team members calculated 
the rate at which animals' hearts pump blood and found that the velocity of 
blood flow was equal to the animals' mass to the one-twelfth power.

"The information was there all along, but its significance had been 
overlooked," said hydrologist Andrea Rinaldo of Italy's University of Padua 
and Switzerland's Ecole Polytechnique Federale. "Animals need to adjust the 
flow of nutrients and heat as their mass changes to maintain the greatest 
possible energy efficiency. That is why animals need a pump -- a heart -- 
and trees do not."

Plugging that information into their equation, the researchers found they 
had attained a complete explanation for Kleiber's Law.

"An elegant answer sometimes is the right one, and there's an elegance to 
this in the sense that it uses very simple geometric arguments," said 
physicist Amos Maritan of the University of Padua. "It doesn't call for any 
specialized structures. It has very few preconditions. You have these two 
lineages, plants and animals, that are very different and they arrive at 
the same conclusion. That is what's called convergent evolution, and the 
stunning result is that it's being driven by the underlying physics and the 
underlying math.”
====================================================================================================================

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so 
certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.
       --- Bertrand Russell

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to