Thanks. I couldn't find the exact references. Is this the popular one?
http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.2675


On 19 March 2014 13:57, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:

>  On 3/18/2014 5:07 PM, LizR wrote:
>
>  On 19 March 2014 12:47, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  But in general that would mean knowing the state of everything the
>> system had interacted with in the past, since it is now entangled with
>> them.  So even if you suppose there is no collapse of the wavefunction,
>> decoherence has the same effect.
>>
>
>  I was only asking about the theoretical possibility, given
> unrealistically perfect information about the state of the system.
>
>
> The universe (assuming unitary QM) is reversible.  In fact from the
> standpoint of QM there is no arrow of time - it's deterministic, just like
> Laplace's universe.  So, as always, when the word "possibility" is used
> there has to be some context.  To *calculate* a history of the universe
> from it's present state would require knowing its *complete* present state,
> including your mental state.  Is that "theoretically possible"?  I think it
> involves a paradox of self-reference.
>
>
>  To put it another way, in the Game of Life, even with perfect
> information, you can't trace the state of the system backwards because it
> loses information. So even the laws of physics couldn't work backwards in a
> universe based on the GOL. QM, I'm informed, doesn't lose information, so
> (very much in theory) you could work backwards - or (less in theory) the
> laws of physics could.
>
>
> Yes the universe doesn't lose information like the GoL.  But relative to
> any point it loses information across spacetime horizons.  So there's no
> way to gather that information up into a calculation unless you have some
> God's eye view from outside the universe, in which case you could see the
> past anyway.
>
> There's a couple of nice papers about this by Yasunori Nomura:
> arXiv:1205.267v2 is a popular exposition and arXiv:1205.5550v2 is a more
> technical paper.
>
> Brent
>
>
>  I wasn't asking whether I could build a chronoscope and watch the past
> happening on TV.
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to