On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:31:28 PM UTC, Liz R wrote:
>
> Thank you. Here is a link to the article in question. Unfortunately I 
> don't wish to spend $32 on buying it in its entirety, but the abstract 
> gives the general idea. It looks as though the heat produced by erasing a 
> bit of information has been experimentally detected via what looks like 
> some delicate measurements.
>
> (Note - this doesn't indicate that any information is actually being 
> destroyed! The bit in question has been turned from the state of a molecule 
> into heat radiation or thermal motion, so unitarity isn't violated :-)
>
> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html<http://www.nature.com/search/executeSearch?sp-advanced=true&sp-m=0&siteCode=default&sp-q=&sp-p=all&sp-q-2=Berut&sp-p-2=all&sp-q-3=&sp-p-3=all&sp-q-4=483&sp-q-5=&sp-q-6=187&sp-q-10=&sp-q-11=&sp-q-12=&sp-start-month=&sp-start-year=&sp-end-month=&sp-end-year=&sp-date-range=0&sp-q-8=&sp-s=&sp-c=25>
>
> Experimental verification of Landauer’s principle linking information and 
> thermodynamics
>    
>    - Antoine 
> Bérut<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#auth-1>
>    , 
>    - Artak 
> Arakelyan<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#auth-2>
>    , 
>    - Artyom 
> Petrosyan<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#auth-3>
>    , 
>    - Sergio 
> Ciliberto<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#auth-4>
>    , 
>    - Raoul 
> Dillenschneider<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#auth-5>
>  
>    - & Eric 
> Lutz<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#auth-6>
>  
>
>
>    - 
> Affiliations<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#affil-auth>
>    - 
> Contributions<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#contrib-auth>
>  
>    - Corresponding 
> author<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#corres-auth>
>
> Nature 483,187–189(08 March 2012)doi:10.1038/nature10872 Received 11 
> October 2011 Accepted 17 January 2012 Published online 07 March 2012 
> Article tools 
>    
>    - 
> Citation<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/ris/nature10872.ris>
>    - 
> Reprints<https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?publisherName=NPGR&publication=Nature&title=Experimental+verification+of+Landauer%2F%26%23x27%3Bs+principle+linking+information+and+thermodynamics&contentID=10.1038%2Fnature10872&volumeNum=483&issueNum=7388&numPages=3&pageNumbers=pp187-189&orderBeanReset=true&publicationDate=2012-03-07&author=Antoine+B%26%23x000E9%3Brut%2C+Artak+Arakelyan%2C+Artyom+Petrosyan%2C+Sergio+Ciliberto%2C+Raoul+Dillenschneider%2C+Eric+Lutz>
>  
>    - Rights & 
> permissions<https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?publisherName=NPG&publication=Nature&title=Experimental+verification+of+Landauer%2F%26%23x27%3Bs+principle+linking+information+and+thermodynamics&contentID=10.1038%2Fnature10872&volumeNum=483&issueNum=7388&numPages=3&pageNumbers=pp187-189&publicationDate=2012-03-07&author=Antoine+B%26%23x000E9%3Brut%2C+Artak+Arakelyan%2C+Artyom+Petrosyan%2C+Sergio+Ciliberto%2C+Raoul+Dillenschneider%2C+Eric+Lutz>
>  
>    - Article 
> metrics<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/nature10872/metrics> 
>
>  In 1961, Rolf Landauer argued that the erasure of information is a 
> dissipative 
> process1<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#ref1>.
>  
> A minimal quantity of heat, proportional to the thermal energy and called 
> the Landauer bound, is necessarily produced when a classical bit of 
> information is deleted. A direct consequence of this logically irreversible 
> transformation is that the entropy of the environment increases by a finite 
> amount. Despite its fundamental importance for information theory and 
> computer 
> science2<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#ref2>,
>  
> 3<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#ref3>,
>  
> 4<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#ref4>,
>  
> 5<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7388/full/nature10872.html#ref5>,
>  
> the erasure principle has not been verified experimentally so far, the main 
> obstacle being the difficulty of doing single-particle experiments in the 
> low-dissipation regime. Here we experimentally show the existence of the 
> Landauer bound in a generic model of a one-bit memory. Using a system of a 
> single colloidal particle trapped in a modulated double-well potential, we 
> establish that the mean dissipated heat saturates at the Landauer bound in 
> the limit of long erasure cycles. This result demonstrates the intimate 
> link between information theory and thermodynamics. It further highlights 
> the ultimate physical limit of irreversible computation.
>
>
>
> On 20 March 2014 12:09, L.W. Sterritt <[email protected] <javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Liz,
>> Discussion of this issue:  Berut et al, Experimental verification of 
>> Landauer’s principle linking information and thermodynamics, Nature 
>> *483,* 187-189 (2012).
>>
>> Lanny Sterritt
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 1:53 PM, LizR <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>> On 20 March 2014 00:54, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote:
>>
>>> Brent,
>>>
>>> If information is not being lost then the amount of information in the 
>>> universe is increasing at a tremendous rate as new events occur, and has 
>>> been since the beginning. So where is all that new information being 
>>> stored? How can ever increasing amounts of information be being stored in 
>>> the SAME amount of matter states?
>>>
>>> As far as I know, unitary evolution in QM implies that the information 
>> content of the universe remains constant. This is why entropy is emergent, 
>> for example, even though it appears on the macroscale to change the amount 
>> of order and disorder. Since the laws of physics are time agnostic at the 
>> fundamental level (bar the usual caveat involving CPT violation) this is to 
>> be expected. You couldn't play physical scenarios backwards even in theory 
>> if information was being created, and the evolution of the wave function 
>> wouldn't be unitary if it was being lost. Hence it stays constant..
>>
>>  
I always thought information was a context of energy and vice verca. I'm 
probably going to keep on thinking that until until someone puts me out of 
my misery by pointing what is fundamentally - or even superficially - 
different.  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to