He suggests quantum computers can't be simulated (probably a lot more
slowly) by classical computers. I thought they could?


On 25 March 2014 10:15, Gabriel Bodeen <gabebod...@gmail.com> wrote:

> He gives six evidences.
>
> First, he falls for quantum pseudoscience.
> Second, he says that he personally failed to make AI when he tried and
> incorrectly implies that difficulty means impossibility.
> Third, he brings up the hard problem and uses it to make an argument from
> ignorance.
> Fourth, he says he doesn't know how to define what he means by
> consciousness, and then makes another argument from ignorance.
> Fifth, he repeats the mistaken Berkeley's Master argument.
> Sixth, he falls for NDE pseudoscience.
>
> Unconvincing.
>
>
> On Monday, March 24, 2014 3:36:43 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness-
>> is-not-a-computation-2
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to