Classical thermodynamics and heat transfer calculates the approach to equilibrium exactly AFAIK. Increasing the amount/range of statistics which I expect entanglement should do should then increase the rate of approach to equilibrium which apparently it does not, otherwise there would be empirical data to support the entanglement story, which apparently there is not. So I suggest that entanglement is just an alternative or more detailed explanation of classical thermodynamics.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>wrote: > > https://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140416-times-arrow-traced-to-quantum-source/ > > I like the idea, but am two naive in theoretical physics to have an > informed opinion. Would more knowledgable people care to comment? > > At first sight, this seems very much inline with Bruno's ideas. > > Best, > Telmo. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
