JR: The Coulomb force also provides the gravity holding galaxies together. RR: What, there is not even gravity in your theory?
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:56 PM, John Ross <[email protected]>wrote: > There is nothing wrong with the standard model and relativity theories. > The question is are they perfect? The other question is: Is there a better > theory? > > > > Congratulations to you for looking at my summary at Amazon.com. I assume > you saw my quote from Stephen Hawking’s Book, *The Theory of Everything*, > basically saying that the current theories are too complicated and we > need a complete theory that can be understood by everyone and when we have > it, “...then we will know the mind of God.” > > > > I happen to believe my theory is a better theory that can be understood by > everyone (if they take the time to try to understand it). I doubt if it is > perfect or complete, but I believe it is better, but I do not yet know the > mind of God. > > > > And I believe most of the questions you raised from reading my short > summary are clearly answered in my 212 book. My theory does not deal with > the Lorentz invariance or lepton numbers. There is no “weak “ or “strong” > force. I explain in my book that the Coulomb force is the only force we > need to explain how our Universe works. However, as Professor Coulomb > proposed long ago at very short distances the Coulomb force can be very > strong! The Coulomb force also provides the gravity holding galaxies > together. > > > > John R. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *LizR > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 07, 2014 8:34 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: TRONNIES > > > > For anyone who's interested, the "good summary of my book ... available at > Amazon.com" reads: > > > > Mr. Ross has identified for the first time the single particle and its > anti-particle that everything in our Universe is made of. It is a point > particle with no mass and no volume, but it has a charge of plus e or minus > e which means these particles carry the Coulomb force. Mr. Ross has named > these particles “TRONNIES”. Tronnies are self-propelled by their own > Coulomb forces at speeds of (pi)/2 times the speed of light and they always > travel in perfect circles in threesomes and twosomes. The threesomes are > electrons and positrons and the twosomes are entrons (also first identified > by Mr. Ross). Mr. Ross shows for the first time the internal structure of > electrons and positrons, and their sizes to be about 2 X 10-18 m. The sizes > of entrons range from about 1 X 10-18 m to about 10 cm (about 100 > million-billion times larger). One entron provides the energy and mass for > each photon. The same entron that provides the gravity of galaxies provides > almost all of the mass of each proton. Three entrons combine to make an > electron and a positron. So electrons, positrons and entrons are made from > tronnies. Everything else is made from entrons or entrons, electrons and > positrons. By “everything” we mean everything: photons, protons, atoms, > molecules, plants, animals, people, moons, planets, stars, galaxies, > electricity, magnetism, gravity and anti-gravity. Mr. Ross reveals to the > general public for the first time how to build universes from these points > of charge and how universes are created and recycled. > > > > One problem I have with this is that it doesn't reveal the reasoning > behind this idea, even in a brief summary. Also, what's the motivation? - > what is wrong with the Standard Model that is explained by this theory? > Which observations are anomalous in the SM but fall naturally out of this > theory? > > Given that this theory clearly violates a lot of the generally accepted > principles of modern physics (lepton number, energy conservation, Lorentz > invariance, Galilean relativity...) it is really incumbent on the author to > explain clearly what is wrong with modern physics, what the fundamental > basis of his theory is (Aristotelean materialism, presumably, but he should > explain in rather more detail) and so on. How do tronnies explain the > (appearance of the) weak and strong forces without recourse to neutrinos > and quarks, for example? How do the masses of the all the muons and so on > drop out of the theory? This needs to be explained at a lower level of > detail than just saying "everything is made out of these particles, which > behave in the following way" - we need to know why anyone would think that > is the case. The reasoning, the maths, any experiments that support this > theory are all notably lacking, so far. > > I don't have time to read another book on fringe science, I tried to read > "The New Science" and wrote a comment (several pages I think) on the first > chapter or so, but I have since stalled and will probably never finish > (sorry!). I didn't look at Edgar Owen's book. I didn't even finish "the > Beginning of Infinity" because I thought the chapter on beauty (iirc) was > nonsense. > > But anyone with a decent theory should be able to summarise it and explain > his reasoning, his assumptions, the steps that lead to his conclusion, etc. > By examining that reasoning, an unbiased observer be able to form an idea > about whether there is anything worthwhile to the theory, i.e. whether it's > self-consistent, how it compares to existing theories, and so on. If it > passes that test, then there's a reason to do some experimental testing. > > > Otherwise this looks like just another idea that seemed like a good idea > to the proposer, but that's about all that can be said for it. And it > certainly isn't going to dethrone my invisible pink unicorn hypothesis any > time soon. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
