On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:03 PM, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
> My theory does not violate conservation of mass-energy. > And all you need to do to show the world that it doesn't is to prove mathematically that .51 +.51 = .51 +.51 +.928. I mean how hard can it be to prove that 1.02 = 1.948 ? > It does not deal with Lepton number. > Then it's not much good. And apparently your theory doesn't deal in momentum either considering that it violates that conservation law too. > How do you know neutrinos have a Lepton number of 1? > Because experiment tells us so. If the Lepton number of neutrons is 1 then Lepton number is conserved in every interaction human beings have ever observed. > How do you know neutrinos exists? Have you ever seen one? > No I have never seen a neutrino, and no human has ever seen radio waves either, or a bacteria, but our instruments have. > I don’t believe neutrinos exist. > That's perfectly OK, neutrinos don't mind a bit because they don't believe you exist. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
