On 12 May 2014, at 03:10, Craig Weinberg wrote:
We don't know that. It could be the case that all detections used by
the abstraction of the universal machine are done by the sensory
substrate in which the machine-program is instantiated. The machine
is only an automated map as far as I can tell. To make it more than
that, the computations must take place within sensory-motive-
time<>space-energy-mass.
I will wait for you to prove this statement.
Nor with 0, s(0), s(s(0)), yes logic is not enough.
I guess you mean that logic + elementary arithmetic is not enough.
But that's is tautological in your non-comp theory.
It's not a theory that I'm imposing though, its an observation. As
sure as I can be that 5-2=3, I can also be sure that no quantitative
function can generate qualia by itself.
Yes, but as observation the machine already say so. And you are right,
we agree on this, but when you disqualify the machine, you confuse her
[]p with her []p & p. You confuse her body clothe with its possible
relation with truth.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
