No I haven’t done any math regarding perturbations. I believe tronnies in general (maybe always) travel in perfect circles so there are no perturbations. This probably also applies to electrons and positrons. There are perturbations in atoms and perturbations in atomic nuclei and radiation is released in the form of photons each of which consists of one entron.
You were getting hot on your idea regarding binding energy and mass. If you look at Table XII in Chapter XIII you will see that a significant portion of all atoms except iron-56 is captured gamma ray entrons. In the pass this portion has been thought of a binding energy. This entron mass in the difference between the total mass of naked protons and naked electrons in the atom and the actual measured mass of the atom. These entrons, one plus tronnie and one minus tronnie, reduce the speed on light particles such as naked protons and naked alpha particles so these particles can more easily stick together. In the big atoms and maybe some of the smaller atoms the entron probably help bind the atoms together. Notice In Table V in Chapter V that gamma ray entrons are a little smaller than atomic nuclei. When these gamma ray entrons are released from the nuclei as gamma ray photons, the mass of the nuclei decreases by an amount equal to the gamma ray mass-energy. John R From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of LizR Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TRONNIES On the subject of the UV catastrophe, I'm still not sure I get this. The particles have no mass and no energy, which is an interesting thought (I once speculated that all the mass of composite particles like the proton might come from the binding energy holding together massless constituents, but I believe this thought had already been considered by far better minds than mine, and the consensus is that SOME of the mass of the proton comes from binding energy, but not all of it. I believe it's quite a high proportion, but I can't remember the percentage.) Anyway, on the subject of tronnies, these are charged particles moving in a circle. I believe charged particles when accelerated are supposed to emit energy, which in a classical view would lead to the system collapsing. However tronnies have no mass or energy (and move faster than light) so I guess this might mean all bets are off. It still seems to me that the system would be unstable, however. Have you done the maths to show that small perturbations don't get magnified, but are damped down - i.e. that the circular orbit in your diagram is the ONLY stable configuration of the tronnies? (e.g. if some passing influence tried to move them slightly farther apart, they wouldn't spiral outwards.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
