On 24 July 2014 18:40, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: This may clarify (or provoke) discussion of Moscow vs. Washington. It's > interesting that Carroll and Sebens use FPI and Sean says it increases his > confidence in Everett's MWI. But in his penultimate paragraph he > essentially lays out an endorsement of Fuchs QBism, which is generally seen > as the instrumentalist alternative to MWI.
Brent, could you possibly summarise what you see as the essential distinction between the C&S and Fuchs alternatives "for dummies"? David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
