On 24 July 2014 18:40, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: This may clarify (or provoke) discussion of Moscow vs. Washington. It's > interesting that Carroll and Sebens use FPI and Sean says it increases his > confidence in Everett's MWI. But in his penultimate paragraph he > essentially lays out an endorsement of Fuchs QBism, which is generally seen > as the instrumentalist alternative to MWI.
Brent, could you possibly summarise what you see as the essential distinction between the C&S and Fuchs alternatives "for dummies"? David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
