Hi, I re-read S. Mitra's paper <http://arxiv.org/pdf/0902.3825v2.pdf> again and it made more sense than before if I assumed that the reversible measurement idea is to be taken as a local reversal to the "direction of entropy flow" in an area and not the entire universe. The trouble is this notion of locality. Are there any favorite definitions of "locality" out there? AFAIK, it does not have a fixed size in space, but may have a fixed size in "space-time" as location information expands at the speed of light if we ignore the effects of local structure that would modulate decoherence. This "decoherence" thing, IMHO, needs to be looked at carefully. In deference to Bruno, I should ask a question relevant to the ongoing discussions. Is a finite universe with locally reversible time consistent as a 1p world?
-- Kindest Regards, Stephen Paul King -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
