On 22 October 2014 08:40, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:14:14AM -0400, John Clark wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> So you don't assume the real numbers exist? > > >> > > > > > > > > > Indeed. > > > > > > > Interesting. > > > > In Bruno's TOE, real numbers don't exist in the same way as integers, > much in the spirit of Kronecker's famous quote: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_Kronecker > Quantum theory would appear to support Kronecker. Relativity is more concerned with real numbers, not to mention continua - but I have a feeling that most physicists would bet on QM as being closer to reality than GR, if pushed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
