On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can accept that it is rational to disbelieve in fairy-tale notion of > god, > There are 2 choices, you can have: 1) A fairy-tale notion of god that is entertaining but silly. 2) A notion for God that lets you preserve the word "God" but is so bland and uncontroversial as to be useless > > I have hundreds of book on theology > Wow , you could make a lot of good wood pulp with all that. > >> According to theology how does consciousness work? > > > > Which one? > Hey I'm not picky, find me any theology that can give a good answer to that question and I'll become the most religious person you ever saw. > > Read Plotinus, > No. > You know something, if I never see another word about the ancient Greeks >> on this list I will not in any way feel deprived. > > > That is because you are not interested in the fundamental questions, > It's because I have nothing but contempt for the idea that my time could be better spent reading Plotinus than reading a modern book about cosmology. > > As you say above, you seem glad with the "I don't know" theory. That theory has one virtue, it is obviously correct, and thus it is vastly superior to a theory that is obviously wrong. John K Clark > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
