if you want say the word ctrl del with a rose

What I said looks alright to me mind you. The point could have been 
interpreted personally but I settled that by following up. 

The reason it wasn't personal is that he is definitely going to be an 
obfuscator if he's one of the two (in fact there's a cluster of 
like-concepts all meaning the same goal involving attempts to avoid facing 
Significance and obtain threshold deniability...

The only difference that is significant here is the different contexts the 
words each cater to. Quibbling is much more the individual resistance to an 
argument or idea with clear significance over whatever different he wants 
to do. Quibbling. The word I said would be for Bruno is very much for the 
inventor and proposer of an idea, succumbing to the temptation that we all 
face, all in the same room that is full of mirrors. 

It's a road that is difficult to reverse once begun. Because these words 
are related as a set to the mental processes selected of rationalizing. 
It's very harmful and will fuck you up for life potentially, in terms of 
any ability to discover and contribute to discovery. Because rationalizing 
puts you ever back behind fears and perversions or how they become...when 
we do that because we lose truth and understanding of it; the means to 
locate it and win it back. 

By the way, the reason I said he didn't do that here, is because he 
correctly perceived Significance. You said infinity theories you no longer 
regard as a way forward. I agree. He doesn't. I strongly agree. He strongly 
felt he was losing you. I strongly felt the way you said it was all about 
not want your friend to feel that way and seeing it that way yourself. 

The reason I was convinced was because just google moments earlier, you had 
surprised by what you said to Brent. I sort of keep track of things by 
assuming no news if conversations follow relationship lowpoint. Low because 
we all get the high baby. There's CHEMISTRY between you and Brent. You're 
like the pull back relationship they put in the middle of those American 
light entertainment friends situated in bars gig. Like the "where everybody 
knows....your name" theme tune. 

It's there...I want some of it! What happens...do they hook up and it works 
but kills the show. Or do they keep going until that moment you know it's a 
shaggy dog story. 

Anyway, you had said something that looked sarcastic to him after he had 
expressed the dim view he took on this infinity business. Yours :harry 
potter, was he there too 

He came back and pointed out quantum mechanic goes the other 
way...constraining, cancelling, etc. You came back with yes that was along 
the lines your comment was nodding. 

If you've come back to where there is at least hope of breakthrough 
discovery. Welcome. You will still be humiliated when that day comes but 
have a reasonable prospect of narrowly escaping the gulag. 

I shall stand and cheer and probably go bolshy and maybe a little camp
..

at least some key person or people. 
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:12:10 PM UTC, Liz R wrote:

> you can delete your posts (I think?)
>
> On 30 October 2014 12:07, <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:03:01 PM UTC, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>> i
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 6:17:12 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28 Oct 2014, at 22:48, LizR wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well that WAS the point of my original post...
>>>>
>>>> : D
>>>>
>>>> On 29 October 2014 00:55, Peter Sas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe 'spam of infinity' is a better term ;)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 'Spam of infinity', or 'Span of Infinities!' You remember surely, Liz, 
>>>> that Cantor proved (in some theory) that there are many infinities, even 
>>>> many sort of infinities. With the plural, span might make sense.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for quibbling on your infinite joke, but I just answered a post 
>>>> by John Clark, and it seems I need to quibble a little bit myself :)
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would say you're more a obfscator than a quibbler . 
>>>
>>
>>  sorry wasn't meant to send the post right then...the above comment 
>> actually represent what is usually the beginning of humour around these 
>> words. And I was actually going use that as a way to explain why you're not 
>> quibbling today. 
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to