On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 02:40:39PM -0800, [email protected] wrote: > > > On Friday, November 14, 2014 10:09:09 PM UTC, Russell Standish wrote: > > > > > > The Multiverse equivalent of conservation of energy is unitarity of > > the evolution of Schroedinger's equation. Or equivalently, that the > > Hamiltonian is Hermitian. > > > > So conservation of energy is a concept that undergoes complex translations > to something completely different. And 'locality' is the concept that has > to have a 1:1 mapping from QM one world to the other. And of course that > selection of that 1:1 mapping is the only reason we need to have a > multiverse with the properties it has. That mapping decision. > > So what is the reasoning why locality has to be mapped as that, and > conservation of energy is good to map to alien structure. > > There isn't a reasoning Russell is there? It's just an arbitrary > preference, or more feasibly it's just what happens to be 'intuitive'.
Conservation of energy is a consequence of Emmy Noether's theorem relating time translation invariance to energy conservation. The equivalent theorem in the quantum setting derives unitarity of the SE from time translation invariance. See Vic Stenger's "Comprehensible Cosmos" for details. These facts have all been mentioned earlier on this thread, and numerous times on this list over the years... I didn't think I needed to spell them out again. > > Another arbitrary link is conservation of energy to the wave particle that > way. You only say that because, again, INTUITIVELY there is sorta kinda a > parallel. I don't think I said anything like that... Sorry, that doesn't make sense. > You'll have nothing more..no derivation. No proof that this the > is the mapping as proof it can't be the set of all the others. > > Tell me this. In science it is normal to expect that it is possible to > derive the general form of a set of equations that represent some partial > form, just so long as those equations are known, the sense in which > partiality, and the translation logic to the multiverse. > Sorry - you'll need to clarify what you mean here. What is "some partial form". What is a "translation logic"? > How come none of you can do this work? Or have even tried? We'll let you know once we know what the "work" is. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au Latest project: The Amoeba's Secret (http://www.hpcoders.com.au/AmoebasSecret.html) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
