That is exactly the same kind of correlation that Motl, Gharibyon, Penna and I are talking about. It is a form of cosmic entanglement.
However, if you recall I extrapolated from G&P's paper that black holes must be intelligent to be monogamus. And in a post to Bruno I speculated the particle wave collapse may work on the same basis. On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:51 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Monday, December 1, 2014 2:30:05 AM UTC, yanniru wrote: >> >> I have read that reference. It is obvious that you have not. >> But then almost everything you post here is baloney. >> So it may not matter if you read the paper or not. >> Richard >> > > I read and we even exchanged about it. But there are other kinds of > correlation showing up on a regular basis now. Such as this: > http://motls.blogspot.com/2014/11/chile-telescope-finds-mysterious-25.html > > I don't think the data driving wormhole speculation correlates with the > data driving the above correlation, for example. So for that reason it > isn't a case of wormholes can explain all the correlations. > > obviously 'wormholes' are not settled science in of themselves, and for > that reason they can explain as much as you like. Your likes probably > exceed mine. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
